• Home
  • Bankruptcy in Brief
  • ABC’s of Bankruptcy
  • Considering Bankruptcy
  • True Stories
  • Chapter 13
  • Blog
  • About
  • TOC

Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box
  • How bankruptcy works
  • Mortgage Matters
  • Consumer Rights
  • You & Your Lawyer
  • Small Business
  • Family Law

Chapter 13 debt limits double for couples

By Cathy Moran

Share
Share on Facebook
Share
Share this
Pin
Pin this
mining-car-double-800px

Each debtor in a Chapter 13 was entitled to debts within the debt ceilings for Chapter 13 eligibility according to a recent bankruptcy decision out of Kansas called Dana Werts.

That effectively doubled the amount of debt a married couple could have and still meet the debt limits of Chapter 13. [Since this decision, Chapter 13 debt limits have significantly increased.]

Judge Karlin recognized that a joint case is simply two separate cases administered together.  The debt of each spouse should be separately calculated and measured against the debt cap.

Previously,  courts have treated a joint case as though it were a single person and required that the debts of the couple be combined to look at Section 109 eligibility.

Even if we’re not in Kansas

This is a marvelous decision for Californians where hard times and underwater real estate increasingly find married couples with collective debts in excess of the limits.  I have found myself deconsolidating cases filed jointly when it was determined that the total debt rendered the couple ineligible, if you assume that the 109 limits apply to the sum of the debts.

It then raises the question of exemptions:  if a joint case is really two cases, are not the debtors entitled to two sets of exemptions?

My thanks to my friend Doug Jacobs for pointing me to this case.

More

Should both spouses file bankruptcy?

California’s phantom discharge for non filing spouse

How Chapter 13 works

More from the Soapbox

  • New Bankruptcy Trends From An Old HandNew Bankruptcy Trends From An Old Hand
  • What You Keep In Chapter 13What You Keep In Chapter 13
  • Your Home Is Not A Piggy BankYour Home Is Not A Piggy Bank
  • Warning: Wells Fargo Can Freeze Your AccountWarning: Wells Fargo Can Freeze Your Account
  • Disarm The Debt Collector: Understanding The Weapons of Debt CollectionDisarm The Debt Collector: Understanding The Weapons of Debt Collection

Filed Under: Chapter 13

About Cathy Moran

I'm a veteran bankruptcy lawyer and consumer advocate in California's Silicon Valley. I write, teach, and speak in the hopes of expanding understanding of how bankruptcy can make life better in a family's future.

Comments

  1. NTC says

    January 26, 2010 at 10:27 pm

    Cathy,

    Great blog! I just stumbled across it a few days ago.

    The Werts case is interesting. It makes logical sense (unusual for a bk case!), particularly from an administrative stand point.

    Do you think the fact that the Werts’ initially filed as a CH7 then forced into a CH13 makes any difference? Any opinion whether that will be distinguished from an initial joint CH13 filing with debts above the limits?

    Aside from the additional costs/fees and twice as much work, are there any disadvantages to filing separately for the debtor?

    Have you had good success (pre Werts) filing individual CH13 petitions for married couples who are jointly over the debt limit but each under if filed separately?

Bankruptcy Basics

About The Soapbox

You’ve arrived at the Bankruptcy Soapbox, a resource of bankruptcy information and consumer law.

Soapbox is a companion site to Bankruptcy in Brief, where I try to be largely explanatory and even handed (Note I said “try”).

Here, I allow myself to tell stories and express strong opinions. We dig deeper into how to consider bankruptcy and navigate a bankruptcy case.

Moran Law Group
Bankruptcy specialists for individuals and small businesses in the San Francisco Bay Area

How Bankruptcy Works

Bankruptcy Alphabet: F is for First

In my Bankruptcy Alphabet, F is for First meeting of creditors. Lots of rumors exist about the that meeting; it produces unwarranted anxiety that is avoidable if you understand what's up. Let's check it out. The first meeting of creditors, also called the 341 meeting, is often the only time a debtor has to appear … Read more

More Posts from this Category

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700
Phone: (650) 368-4700

Categories

All content copyright © 2025 Moran Law Group. All rights reserved.