• Home
  • Bankruptcy in Brief
  • ABC’s of Bankruptcy
  • Considering Bankruptcy
  • True Stories
  • Chapter 13
  • Blog
  • About
  • TOC

Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer

On The Bankruptcy Soapbox

The Soap Box
  • How bankruptcy works
  • Mortgage Matters
  • Consumer Rights
  • You & Your Lawyer
  • Small Business
  • Family Law

Will recent credit card use sink my bankruptcy

By Cathy Moran

Share
Share on Facebook
Share
Share this
Pin
Pin this
credit-cards-sink-case

If I’ve used credit cards before filing bankruptcy, do I have to wait?

Too many people considering filing think there is some sort of waiting period between financial activity and filing bankruptcy.

So, let’s look at the issues in play surrounding recent credit card charges and seeking bankruptcy relief.

There’s no 90 day rule

Everyone talks about a 90 day rule in bankruptcy. The rule, as reported, is that you can’t buy anything, or maybe, can’t pay anyone, or charge anything. Not so.

The only 90 day rule in bankruptcy applies to creditors, not debtors.

Nothing in bankruptcy law or practice requires any sort of action, or inaction, on the part of someone who needs to file bankruptcy.

The trustee doesn’t examine the statements for credit card use to see if you are “worthy” of bankruptcy, or have commited some disqualifying act. The trustee only cares that if you bought assets on credit, those assets appear on your schedules.

Who cares about credit card use?

Credit card issuers care about your recent credit card use. In particular, card issuers have a right to object if you use their credit card without intending to repay the charge.

The Bankruptcy Code makes debts incurred by fraud potentially non-chargeable. That is, the fraudulent charges are excluded from the bankruptcy discharge. But that only happens if the card issuer formally objects.

To exclude their claim from the discharge, the creditor must

  • File an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy case
  • Act within 60 days of the date set for the 341 meeting
  • Prevail at trial to establish that the charge was fraudulent

Given the expense involved (filing fees, lawyers, discovery), creditors are not quick to file non-dischargeablity actions. Most such suits are filed where the charges are large, frivolous, or particularly close in time to the bankruptcy filing.

Importantly, the legal presumption is that the debt is dischargeable. The creditor bears the burden at trial to overcome that presumption. In a sense, the cards are stacked in the debtor’s favor.

The paperwork you file in your bankruptcy case calls for the date on which you paid a lawyer in connection with the case. That’s an easy point for the world to figure that you didn’t expect to repay charges that you made after that.

The discharge is not at risk

Even when a particular debt, or a part of a debt, is found to be non dischargeable because of fraud, the debtor gets a discharge of the rest of the dischargeable debts.

Debts not dischargeable

The discharge only gets denied as to all creditors when the debtor commits some egregious, dishonest acts that offend the bankruptcy system as a whole.

When waiting makes sense

Remember the old adage: time heals all wounds? When looking back at your credit card usage, if a large or questionable transaction shows up, waiting to file may reduce the chances that the creditor files an objection.

Timing is everything in bankruptcy

The presence of payments made after the stand-out charge lessens the sense that you didn’t intend to repay when you made the charge.

Bottom line

Thorough disclosure of the facts on your schedules and honest treatment of your credit card issuers, and your bankruptcy will sail through.

More

Don’t tidy up before seeing a bankruptcy lawyer

What’s the trustee looking for in bank statements

Selling stuff before bankruptcy

Will I get a discharge

More from the Soapbox

  • Acing Bankruptcy’s Means Test For Those Over Median IncomeAcing Bankruptcy’s Means Test For Those Over Median Income
  • What looks bad to the trustee in prebankruptcy conductWhat looks bad to the trustee in prebankruptcy conduct
  • Who Cares About Your Spending Before Bankruptcy?Who Cares About Your Spending Before Bankruptcy?
  • What Is The Bankruptcy Trustee Looking ForWhat Is The Bankruptcy Trustee Looking For
  • When Bankrupting The Business Doesn’t Protect The OwnerWhen Bankrupting The Business Doesn’t Protect The Owner

Filed Under: Featured, How bankruptcy works Tagged With: 2024, 90 day rule, bank statements in bankruptcy, trustee examination

About Cathy Moran

I'm a veteran bankruptcy lawyer and consumer advocate in California's Silicon Valley. I write, teach, and speak in the hopes of expanding understanding of how bankruptcy can make life better in a family's future.

Bankruptcy Basics

About The Soapbox

You’ve arrived at the Bankruptcy Soapbox, a resource of bankruptcy information and consumer law.

Soapbox is a companion site to Bankruptcy in Brief, where I try to be largely explanatory and even handed (Note I said “try”).

Here, I allow myself to tell stories and express strong opinions. We dig deeper into how to consider bankruptcy and navigate a bankruptcy case.

Moran Law Group
Bankruptcy specialists for individuals and small businesses in the San Francisco Bay Area

How Bankruptcy Works

Bankruptcy Alphabet: F is for First

In my Bankruptcy Alphabet, F is for First meeting of creditors. Lots of rumors exist about the that meeting; it produces unwarranted anxiety that is avoidable if you understand what's up. Let's check it out. The first meeting of creditors, also called the 341 meeting, is often the only time a debtor has to appear … Read more

More Posts from this Category

643 Bair Island Road
Suite 403
Redwood City, CA 94063
Phone: (650) 694-4700
Phone: (650) 368-4700

Categories

All content copyright © 2025 Moran Law Group. All rights reserved.